Yes, I am uploading this blog a little late. Well, am a little unwell. That is okay though. Better late than never, right? Recently, to be precise, on December 3, was celebrated the Indian National Lawyers', or rather the Advocates', Day.
The day is celebrated to insist on the ethics of the profession. A huge demand it may look like as, apparently, in the imaginary of the common perception, lawyers are all that is wicked, manipulative and money-minded.
Actually, the justice system in India is skewed because of sheer statistics. The number of cases pending in the court is almost in millions. Many amongst them are undertrials who thus spend a lifetime in the impossible conditions of the (indian) jails without even/ever being tried.
In other words, "tarikh pe tarikh", 'date after date' is not merely a filmy dialogue. Often are blamed the judges' colonial set of holidays for such an unforgivable delay as 'justice delayed is justice denied'.
Yet I would like to insist that the Goddess of Justice, who now speaks in the local Indian languages as well, is not blind at all. She is impartial. It has been proven in so many seminal cases which have altered the very destiny of India, beginning with the famous Keshavananda Bharati case, the Shah Bano Case, the Ayodhya Ram Janma Bhoomi case, to give a few salient examples.
As for corruption or lack of ethics in the judicial system, the sad truth is, no other field of public and/or private life is free of such corrosion. Instead of, hence, accusing the supreme court chief justices of being lackeys of the central government, especially after retirement, why not think positively that their vast knowledge is being put to positive use that would be good for the entire polity?
Such was the opinion of the ex-CJI Chandrachud, too, who was also viciously hounded because the P.M. attended the Ganesh Poojan at his official residence! Secularism seems to assume weird avataars according to convenience!
Pratima@ The judiciary is defined as the branch of government that interprets laws, settles disputes, and administers justice. This system of courts serves as the guardian of the constitution and fundamental rights, with a structure that is hierarchical, beginning from the Lower to the Supreme Court.
The quote of the day: In the much anthologised 'seven ages of man', Shakespeare mocks the corrupt 'justice' (actually, in Shakespeare-an parlance, it need not mean only the judge, though) as follows: "And then the justice,/ In fair round belly with good capon lined,/ With eyes severe and beard of formal cut,/ Full of wise saws and modern instances;/And so he plays his part."
The word of the day: Lawyer versus advocate. . A lawyer, according to the technical definition, has a law degree, while an advocate is a lawyer, licensed to represent clients in court by passing a Bar exam, and by registering with the Bar Council. In other words, all advocates are lawyers. Yet all lawyers need not be advocates. Some lawyers may only provide legal advice, and work outside of court.
Let us learn grammar: These days, it is very fashionable to dismiss grammar in the name of so-called communication. Yes, communication does matter, but communication, as we hope to prove, stands on the firm footing of grammar as it is, otherwise, wobbly and shaky.
To give an ancient (in both the senses, that is from the olden days, and, aged, as it has been repeated generations long) example, in English, the subject/the doer and the object/on whom the action takes place have their given, structured placement in an English sentence. Hence it has to be "Rama killed Ravana", though certain interpretations may question such (in)justice!
More about grammar as we meet day after day.