Whatever actually happened in the examination hall on that fateful day in the IIT-Mumbai, many lives thus ended. Obviously, a young boy, a teenager, committed suicide. With that demise and the ensuing accusations, died the reputations of a sincere teacher and his director.
Evaporated in to thin air the fame of a prestigious institute, given the extremely ugly shenanigans that continue. And how about the already mired in to controversies indian education system? Surely such incidents do not exactly oxygenate it, right?
Is there a possible solution which can be used even beyond the hallowed IIT premises? Every facet should be thought through first. To begin with, most UG/PG students do not want to study these days. They bunk lectures like anything, hopefully with their ambitious parents' knowledge. Many lecturers, too, prefer the easy way out of indirectly leaking the question paper instead of actually teaching the syllabus thoroughly.
Hence, instead of a facade of a ritual called exam, why not make it open book? The question paper can then genuinely be truly evaluative. It can be extremely creative, too. Every possible skill, critical thinking, problem solving, analytical skills, communication skills, can all be tasted through case studies.
Allow the examinees their textbooks in the exam hall. Mobiles must be kept away though. Jammers can be operative, moreover, in case a smartie smuggles one in his/her pocket. Thus only those students who actually know the subject properly would pass!
Minimum invigilation needed! No accusations involved! No mere MCQ test either! No mockery called memorisation the night before of "imp" questions! Overhaul the entire exam system, in brief!
This way, the ball would entirely be in the students' court. They would have to attend lectures. Teachers hence would have to conduct lectures! Case studies, moreover, cannot be shamelessly repeated year after year as there has to be a library copy of the question paper, right? Three paper sets must be designed which would have to be counter-checked, but not by the paper-setter's dear friend, a practice which is most often a mode of dining n paying buddies via the institutional funding!
Alternatives do exist, in brief. And not much out of the box thinking is involved either!
Pratima@ Suppose a scenario wherein the invigilator is not open category, while the student is! Are you sure then that the favourite Bramhinical etc etc pattern would not be mocked? How far, how long, how much and whose victimisation, please!?!