Each year, just as the monsoon arrives sooner or later, though rather rarely on June 7, the Mruga Nakshtra (that is, the "deer's head constellation", also known as the "searching star") Day, with the same consistency, though the exact dates may be irregular, get declared the results of various examinations, the different boards, the JEE, and so on.
Thus begins the annual trashing/thrashing of the toppers. Yes, it indeed is so! First and foremost, there is a huge wave of public sympathetic consolation of those who fail or get less marks. Wonderful philosophies such as 'marks do not mark success in life' do the rounds! Nobody bothers to ask these souls soothing in sympathy why and who stopped them from studying, especially when there are so many avenues open, be it tuition classes to the AV 4D self study material!
As it is, the syllabi, the textbooks, and marking modes and result declarations are getting easier by the day. You can pass the Tenth Board Exams without opting for Maths, actually eternally needed in real daily lived life, for instance. Anyways, only five subjects go in to the ma(r)king of the final result! Who is to, however, tell the sentimentalists that the syllabi are so easy, and with so many options that with a little bit of efforts, anybody and everybody can comfortably score a first class!
In the process, the brilliant students who, moreover are consistent and diligent with their studies, are treated as if they are the pariah! As if getting excellent marks is a sin! In this version of the marks 'making' scenario, the case is always that it is so easy to get marks! There is also a subtle but sure pressure on you to prove that you are not a book worm, how you studied minimally, and how you were also so very busy with very many extra-curricular activities!
Why the guilt complex indeed? Just as there are duffers, there are toppers! Why trash them? Why thrash them by harshly dismissing success? Just as there is no need whatsoever to humiliate those who get less marks (especially if they suffer from dyslexia, et al or physical disabilities or social discrimination such as poverty), there is not any logic to belittling the achievers either, right?
Does not every field have a unique space for the brilliant, for the uniquely talented? Many play chess, for instance. The grandmaster is only one in the world! There is no sense in grudging such players in the top notch guild in the name of mediocre players who, too, have the entire internet to access for sources for/of committed practice, right?
Yet another example is cricket. Every gully has at least three or four cricket teams. To be a Kohli or Dhoni, however, is needed talent nurtured through sincerity of purpose! Why, every bathroom singer fancies himself/herself a crooner. Look at Arijit Singh's efforts to be a success though. Why, he even changed his very voice tonality! Hard work, genuine, sincere riyaz never escaped a Lata Mangeshkar either. Why, in other words, tarnish an achiever because people who are mediocre, who, moreover, lack in consistency and sincerity, but have a gang of sympathisers?
When a society belittles achievers in subtle ways, unmistakably there is a rise of mediocrity which believes in and glorifies to skies the"jugad" or "connections" of all sorts! (No wonder, we want proof from our bravehearts!) Hardly the formula for any achievement, however small, but sincere in purpose, genuine in efforts!
Pratima@Why mock those who aim and settle for stars just because you cannot crawl, right?