'Once upon a time, there was a queen'. This is how begin the childhood tales which take us on fairy wings to far away lands. When it comes to our motherland, however, there indeed were two queens from faraway lands who ruled our destinies.
The first one of them is Queen Elizabeth I. On December 31, 1600, she promulgated the East India Company Charter which granted the Company of Merchants of London Trading a 'carte blanche' for the lucrative spice trade in India, Africa and parts of Eastern n Latin America. At the peak of her reign, the decree was to enable British merchants a better competition with the other marauding Europeans.
The colonising process which thus began reached its zenith when the second queen who affected our destinies most remarkably became the monarch. Yes, I am referring to Queen Victoria. Exactly hundred and fifty years ago, in 1786, she adopted the title, Kaiser-e-Hind. The Parliamentary formalities were completed by May 31, 1876. In Delhi Durbar, it was proclaimed the next year.
The title means the Empress/Emperor of India. It was coined in 1876 by the orientalist G.W. Leitner. It was thus used by successive British monarchs in India until George VI. The 1947 Indian Independence Act obviously abolished it.
Incidentally, very soon, on April 10, 1900, Queen Victoria instituted the Kaisar-i-Hind Medal to recognize citizens of any nationality for public service in India. These were awarded in Gold, Silver, and Bronze grades.
Mahatma Gandhi received the Gold Medal in 1915 from Lord Hardinge for his ambulance and medical service work in South Africa. He returned the medal in 1920 during the Non-Cooperation and Khilafat movements.
The term also refers to a butterfly. Yet nothing flew on the wings of fancy for Indians during the era of this empress of india! Let us forget the famines because much more horrible was the indirect impact. The notorious 1835 Macaulay Minute on Education during her regime formally incarcerated our 'i'dentities in to an infuriating inferiority complex, for instance.
Much worse was the effect of the writings of John Stuart Mill. His apparently liberal-democratic mode of thinking moulded the minds of the "sahibs" sent to rule India, and thus was the caste system iron clad cast!
Though she loved dachshunds as pets, her regime demeaned women notably as it was during her reign was created that ideal "angel by the hearth" idol which continues to bind the better half of humanity, though her own remarks about marriage and motherhood, not to forget the suffragist movement, are quite interesting to say the least! In brief, the empire of this "Kaisar-e-Hind" held sway over a dominion that determined the domain of identity in multiple ways!
Pratima@ Very soon I think I should be able to share with you, Dear Reader, yet another tale of 'i'dentity formation during her reign. Fingers firmly crossed currently!
Quote of the day: "We are not amused." That is her most famous quote! Well, the sanctimonious hypocrisy of her times which edited the "bawdy" elements in Shakespeare's plays, and which saw to it that the "legs" of tables n chairs would not be not naked, but covered, is extremely amusing, especially in hindsight!
Word of the day: dominion Dominion is the power to rule and control.
No comments:
Post a Comment